No. Systems: Indian vs. Western
INDIAN
|
10N
|
WESTERN
|
Das
|
10
|
Ten
|
Saw
|
102
|
Hundred
|
Hazar
|
103
|
Thousand
|
Lakh
|
105
|
-
|
-
|
106
|
Million
|
Crore
|
107
|
-
|
Arab
|
109
|
Billion
|
Kharab
|
1011
|
-
|
-
|
1012
|
Trillion
|
Neel
|
1013
|
-
|
Padma
|
1015
|
Quadrillion
|
Shankh
|
1017
|
-
|
-
|
1018
|
Quintillion
|
Udpadha
|
1019
|
-
|
Ank
|
1021
|
Sextillion
|
-
|
1024
|
Septillion
|
-
|
1027
|
Octillion
|
-
|
1030
|
Nonillion
|
-
|
1033
|
Decillion
|
-
|
1036
|
Undecillion
|
-
|
1039
|
Duodecillion
|
-
|
1042
|
Tredecillon
|
-
|
1045
|
Quattuordecillion
|
-
|
1048
|
Quindecillion
|
-
|
1051
|
Sexdecillion
|
-
|
1054
|
Septendecillion
|
-
|
1057
|
Octodecillion
|
-
|
1060
|
Novemdecillion
|
-
|
1063
|
Vigintillion
|
-
|
10100
|
Googol
|
-
|
10303
|
Centillion
|
-
|
10Googol
|
Googolplex
|
Assumption: Names of nos. which can be represented as
multiples of 10 only have been considered, as they can form the basis for
naming further nos. Hence, Graham’s no., TREE sequence, etc. have not been
considered.
I was knowing upto 'kharab' and 'trillion'. Beyond that I was not knowing. So the comparison is very useful to me. It's great!
ReplyDeleteI was knowing upto 'kharab' and 'trillion'. Beyond that I was not knowing. So the comparison is very useful to me. It's great! .....TKDev
ReplyDelete